Thursday, 11th of February, 2010
The internets are hard for some people… (1:43 pm)
Yesterday, ReadWriteWeb published an article about the new changes at Facebook, including their new arrangement integrating Facebook into AOL Instant Messenger, and also the implications of Facebook Connect. It's a good article, but had the strange misfortune (one might say) of getting onto the first page of Google results for "facebook login". As we say, here on the internets, hilarity ensued. The comments thread was almost instantly deluged with people who appear to login to facebook by typing "facebook login" into Google, clicking on some high-up link, and then… trying to login. They are then confronted with RWW's blog post, seem to find their way to the Facebook Connect button, and believe they are thus logging into Facebook. It's really hilarious. You should read the thread, or as much as you can bear. Pages and pages of it.
And so on. All the above are authenticated Facebook users. But it's more than just hilarious. It's a good lesson for those of us for whom the internet comes easy. It brings the message home even more strongly than the stupid email forwards and Facebook memes and phishing scams. This is what we're dealing with. Sure, Facebook Connect is a slightly complex concept: it's one of a number of ways that people can tell any site who they are; you say to that site (RWW in this case), "I'm Peter Hollo at Facebook", and prove it by authenticating with Facebook Connect. The site gets some confirmation direct from Facebook, and says, "OK, you're now Peter Hollo (Facebook) over here and can comment away". Trouble is, the people we're dealing with in this comments thread are miles away from understanding this. They don't seem to even understand the URL bar – and one begins to see why phishing scams are so successful… They recognize the branding of Facebook, but take little else from the page they're presented with. Google said it was a "facebook login" page, so why is it all red? Where's my Farmville? I'm not sure what the ultimate lesson is here, but we should at least remember that there are an awful lot of people out there who are essentially internet illiterate, and are trying to get by in this fast-moving, intertextual, inter-connected world. And it's hard.
Check the sidebar for archive links!
|
Twittering:
Utility Fog, Peter's show on FBi Radio in Sydney. Raven, Peter's solo music. FourPlay String Quartet, Peter's band. Peter has a LiveGerbil, too! Friend me if you know me, but don't expect many posts there. rss2, rss or atom feeds. Tasty! Via those feeds, Stumblings is syndicated over @ LiveJournal if you want to add it to your friends list - but please come over here to leave comments (I don't check 'em there!) Sidebar all too much? Check out all reviews separately in the: Reading archives | Listening archives Other weblogs of note: angelog poison to the mind the null device virulent memes (which is no more) the lexicon, for the lovely lexi's lexcellent & lexstatic, um, music reviews :) charlie stross's diary chris lawson et al's talking squid Roger Langridge's hotel fred crooked timber greensblog larvatus prodeo (etc) My Amazon.co.uk wishlist Peter's recently played tracks (via last.fm)
Monthly archives:
Other: Login if you're, like, the author or something Meta: RSS 2.0 Comments RSS 2.0 WordPress |
43 queries. 1.019 seconds. Powered by WordPress |
Yup, I've seen some pretty strange behaviour from people whose jobs are basically un-doable without the internet and who you'd expect to know how these things work. You're 100% right about the address bar. I've seen more than one person make a habit of typing the address they want into Google and then click through.
For these people Google *is* 'the internet' and they are clinging to what little they know for dear life!
As a member of Gen Y who took to the internet like a duckling in water it's hard to realise that this impersonal, context-sensitive mode of communication is inherently abstract and thus as confusing to people whose existence is inherently material and concrete as their communication is for me.
But there it is: we all communicate differently. And some people really are going to continue being really bad at the internet…
Can't remember the exact number, but Google reported that a reasonable percentage of searches could have been typed into the address bar directly to get the desired result.