<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Algebra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frogworth.com/blog/archives/2006/02/18/on-algebra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frogworth.com/blog/archives/2006/02/18/on-algebra/</link>
	<description>a sporadic weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 05:03:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drinkwater</title>
		<link>http://www.frogworth.com/blog/archives/2006/02/18/on-algebra/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Drinkwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogworth.com/blog/?p=540#comment-330</guid>
		<description>not to nitpick but Cohen is saying that there were many people at his school who could do math but not English, not that all of the kids who could do math couldn&#039;t do English - he never says that the one implies the other.  Nonetheless he should learn how to write a readable English sentence himself, else he&#039;s even worse than those math whizzes he insults.  And his standards of proof are far lower than anything in math or science - where&#039;d he get them?  Everything else he says is, of course, complete and total crap.  You do have to feel sorry for the girl - though anyone who wants to become a medical assistant after failing Algebra 1 several times should seriously consider psychiatric help.  Let&#039;s just agree that Cohen is a nut job bullshitter and leave it at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not to nitpick but Cohen is saying that there were many people at his school who could do math but not English, not that all of the kids who could do math couldn't do English &#8211; he never says that the one implies the other.  Nonetheless he should learn how to write a readable English sentence himself, else he's even worse than those math whizzes he insults.  And his standards of proof are far lower than anything in math or science &#8211; where'd he get them?  Everything else he says is, of course, complete and total crap.  You do have to feel sorry for the girl &#8211; though anyone who wants to become a medical assistant after failing Algebra 1 several times should seriously consider psychiatric help.  Let's just agree that Cohen is a nut job bullshitter and leave it at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.frogworth.com/blog/archives/2006/02/18/on-algebra/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 06:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogworth.com/blog/?p=540#comment-321</guid>
		<description>I was going to say, also, that one of the reasons that students hate maths so much is that so many maths teachers are so dire. And the reason for that is that education is so undervalued in our society that becoming a teacher is what you do when you fail at everything else. Teaching should be one of the most desired vocations there is. It should stem from a love of interacting with young people, and from a passion for communicating ideas. Above all it should be about inspiring students to be interested in the subject, interested in learning.

(I guess the other reason students hate maths is that it&#039;s too much like hard work. And seems uncool. But inspired teaching is the answer to this too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say, also, that one of the reasons that students hate maths so much is that so many maths teachers are so dire. And the reason for that is that education is so undervalued in our society that becoming a teacher is what you do when you fail at everything else. Teaching should be one of the most desired vocations there is. It should stem from a love of interacting with young people, and from a passion for communicating ideas. Above all it should be about inspiring students to be interested in the subject, interested in learning.</p>
<p>(I guess the other reason students hate maths is that it's too much like hard work. And seems uncool. But inspired teaching is the answer to this too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.frogworth.com/blog/archives/2006/02/18/on-algebra/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 06:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogworth.com/blog/?p=540#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that, Tim! Educational as vocational training is a sad, sad thing. There&#039;ll still be people like you &amp; me who choose their subjects entirely because they&#039;re interesting, and get themselves a rounded education out of it, but it&#039;s hardly something that&#039;s encouraged these days.

And due to having had a very good rounded education, I do have a good idea of history, and therefore a good context in which to understand my society. Indeed, regardless of how much I hated English at school (due in no small part to having abominably bad teachers all the way through high school), I know my Shakespeare, and know enough about the classics of the canon. I have to say, though, that I was doing well in philosophy at uni because of skills taught me by my mother (linguistics teacher @ UNSW) and in other subjects (music, French, Latin, etc) as well as my own reading of philosophy &amp; science rather than from my English teachers. Sad, but somewhat true.

I think you&#039;re right that both should be compulsory, although whether the mark should have to count? Probably... it&#039;s a tricky one. Making the mark count means making your performance in the subjects count as well as just ensuring you scraped a pass. I guess we should care about that. It&#039;d be nice if we didn&#039;t have to care so much about the minutiae of the marks anyway, but we have so many people trying to get into the Unis these days that I can&#039;t see another way of doing things. Direct entrance exams held by the individual institutions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that, Tim! Educational as vocational training is a sad, sad thing. There'll still be people like you &amp; me who choose their subjects entirely because they're interesting, and get themselves a rounded education out of it, but it's hardly something that's encouraged these days.</p>
<p>And due to having had a very good rounded education, I do have a good idea of history, and therefore a good context in which to understand my society. Indeed, regardless of how much I hated English at school (due in no small part to having abominably bad teachers all the way through high school), I know my Shakespeare, and know enough about the classics of the canon. I have to say, though, that I was doing well in philosophy at uni because of skills taught me by my mother (linguistics teacher @ UNSW) and in other subjects (music, French, Latin, etc) as well as my own reading of philosophy &amp; science rather than from my English teachers. Sad, but somewhat true.</p>
<p>I think you're right that both should be compulsory, although whether the mark should have to count? Probably&#8230; it's a tricky one. Making the mark count means making your performance in the subjects count as well as just ensuring you scraped a pass. I guess we should care about that. It'd be nice if we didn't have to care so much about the minutiae of the marks anyway, but we have so many people trying to get into the Unis these days that I can't see another way of doing things. Direct entrance exams held by the individual institutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.frogworth.com/blog/archives/2006/02/18/on-algebra/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogworth.com/blog/?p=540#comment-319</guid>
		<description>It comes down to the devaluing of education in society in general; Nelson&#039;s university reforms, for example, are geared to making university a place of vocational training rather than a place where knowledge and learning is valued above everything else.

I can&#039;t imagine that she&#039;d be able to get through that many university courses without algebra. The point of learning is not whether you need to know something in your daily life, though - I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever directly used my knowledge of ancient history in daily life - but that knowledge in general enriches you - like you say, if you have no concept of algebra, you have no concept of logic, whereas knowledge of history makes you see society in a different way. 

Knowledge of the canon of English literature is important too; taught well, you can learn a lot from Shakespeare. I agree that there should be more emphasis on English skills as opposed to literature - certainly the quality of undergraduate essays I&#039;ve read recently is quite shocking. But there are benefits in English essays - the high distinctions you got at university were partly due to learning how to write essays in English, I&#039;m sure - any English teacher worth their salt would have grounded you in the technique of writing, the logic and structure and rhetoric.

As to whether it should be compulsory, I suspect that both it and maths should be compulsory - maths was effectively compulsory at my (selective) high school, by the way, and at many others - because I believe that people should have a rounded education, even if they wish to specialise. 

tim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It comes down to the devaluing of education in society in general; Nelson's university reforms, for example, are geared to making university a place of vocational training rather than a place where knowledge and learning is valued above everything else.</p>
<p>I can't imagine that she'd be able to get through that many university courses without algebra. The point of learning is not whether you need to know something in your daily life, though &#8211; I don't think I've ever directly used my knowledge of ancient history in daily life &#8211; but that knowledge in general enriches you &#8211; like you say, if you have no concept of algebra, you have no concept of logic, whereas knowledge of history makes you see society in a different way. </p>
<p>Knowledge of the canon of English literature is important too; taught well, you can learn a lot from Shakespeare. I agree that there should be more emphasis on English skills as opposed to literature &#8211; certainly the quality of undergraduate essays I've read recently is quite shocking. But there are benefits in English essays &#8211; the high distinctions you got at university were partly due to learning how to write essays in English, I'm sure &#8211; any English teacher worth their salt would have grounded you in the technique of writing, the logic and structure and rhetoric.</p>
<p>As to whether it should be compulsory, I suspect that both it and maths should be compulsory &#8211; maths was effectively compulsory at my (selective) high school, by the way, and at many others &#8211; because I believe that people should have a rounded education, even if they wish to specialise. </p>
<p>tim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

