|
Last 50 mainblog entries:
Monday, 24th of November, 2003
Advertorial (12:55 pm)
Forgettin’ to advertise myself again! Late notice, gig tonight featuring myself on cello and Danny Weltlinger of many variegated fabulosities (ex-Monsieur Camembert, now of Ticklers, Nadia’s gypsy band, so on and so forth) on violin. We’re doing free improv as part of a duos night at the ‘if you like Improvised Music, We like you’ improv night at Space 3. Come along if you can :) Sunday, 23rd of November, 2003
Egan on Refugees (9:12 pm)
Perth author Greg Egan is pretty much universally considered the apex of hard science fiction writing the world over. For the last couple of years, however, he’s hardly written any science fiction at all. Why? He’s been devoting his energies to publicising the plight of refugees in Australia. In early 2002 he wrote a piece called No Sugar, and he’s now followed it up with The Razor Wire Looking Glass – essential reading. A Just Australia, who Greg links to, are holding Daybreak in Detention events around Australia; one’s happening on December 12-14 at Bondi Pavillion. I’ll be there for some of it, and I hope lots of other will too.
Comments Off
Tuesday, 18th of November, 2003
Political Survey (10:45 pm)
Here’s an alternative to the Political Compass – another two-dimensional alternative to simple left/right political analysis, but in this case the second axis is utilitarian/pragmatic rather than libertarian/authoritarian. I’m not sure whether I like it better than Political Compass (henceforth PC): my results are actually a lot more variable with this one (henceforth PS) than with PC, suggesting that I’m less sympathetic to the way the questions are worded here than I am with PC. Strangely, PS’s rationale suggests that PC might be skewed “to make respondents lean towards an economically right-wing, socially liberal (’right libertarian’) position”… Maybe I really am extremely left-wing (as my results seem to suggest this time, although I was quite a bit less far-left last time) but I’ve always come out about -7 or 8 towards both left and libertarian in PC, and all my friends are pretty left too. Anyway, both are a good step in the right direction – that is, away from a simple left/right divide, which leaves out a lot of detail. All in all, one’s political views are a lot more nuanced than either of these analyses can show. For instance, I’m very much a social libertarian, but very much a Green leftie as well, which means that I believe that markets should be regulated with respect to environmental issues and workers’ rights… which sounds authoritarian doesn’t it? All in all, I’m still happier saying I’m a “left-libertarian” (or “green-left-libertarian-feminist-atheist”? Ah… yes well, sometimes too much detail is just silly) than a “left-slightly-more-pragmatic-rather-than-idealist”. Thanks to Mr Stross’s LiveGerbil for this’un.
Raview (5:30 pm)
There’s a nice review of Timmy Koch’s Please Don’t Tell Me That’s Your Remix album here. “In recent times,” it says, “we’ve seen B(if)tek’s Frequencies will be remixed, Prop’s cut, cook, copy, destroy and Fourplay’s great double remix album.” Hey! That’s my band! Maybe they couldn’t remember the title of Digital Manipulation. (Naw, I jest…)
Find out more about Raven, like, here. If you like. Don’t feel like I’m pressuring you or anything. Friday, 7th of November, 2003
Apologies (10:19 pm)
To all my faithful readers, and I know there are, well dozens of you out there in the woodworks somewhere, I hereby apologise profusely for my lack of reading updation lately. This will be resolved at the earliest opportunity. Postscript: Pratchett review up now! See sidebar.
Comments Off
Tuesday, 4th of November, 2003
WELL, it’s the Charlie & Cory show (again, inverted) (10:21 pm)
Right now, over at The WELL Charlie Stross is in conversation with Well members and others. The conversation is lead by fellow author Cory Doctorow (whose short story collection A Place So Foreign and Eight More is out now and highly recommended). They’re talking about all sorts of stuff, not least the ol’ Singularity.
Comments Off
Lakoff on language and politics (8:31 pm)
Here’s a fascinating interview with linguist George Lakoff, explaining how conservatives (he’s American, so this means Republicans, who are simultaneously seeming both more reactionary and more radical these days) have learnt to use language phenomenally effectively to “frame” an issue, and thus subtly control the way the public thinks about it. That progressives/liberals (the political left/Green) are being left behind comes as no surprise to some of us on the left, and Lakoff’s call for progressives to use framing ourselves to challenge the right’s world-building should not be ignored as some kind of academic issue. Framing of particular concepts can entrench them as real in an insidiously misleading way. Consider:
Comments Off
Check the sidebar for archive links!
|
Twittering:
Posting tweet... Powered by Twitter Tools. Frogworth Corp, our parent company. Utility Fog, Peter's show on FBi Radio in Sydney. Peter has a LiveGerbil, too! Friend me if you know me, but don't expect many posts there. rss2, rss or atom feeds. Tasty! Via those feeds, Stumblings is syndicated over @ LiveJournal if you want to add it to your friends list - but please come over here to leave comments (I don't check 'em there!) Sidebar all too much? Check out all reviews separately in the: Reading archives | Listening archives Last 5 comments: Blog redesign(s) coming up... 23.04.2009 (08:50 pm) Hahahahaha 23.10.2008 (11:13 am) Testing, testing 23.05.2008 (09:09 pm) Do The Test 26.03.2008 (06:56 pm) Sorry 14.02.2008 (03:23 pm) Jump to: Current/recommended reading Current/recommended listening — bugger all here, but these days you can read some of my reviews at the cyclic defrost blog and in cyclic defrost itself (abridged, with free typos/grammatical mistakes added!)... Recently played tracks (via last.fm) Other weblogs of note: angelog poison to the mind the null device virulent memes (which is no more) the lexicon, for the lovely lexi's lexcellent & lexstatic, um, music reviews :) charlie stross's diary chris lawson et al's talking squid Roger Langridge's hotel fred crooked timber greensblog larvatus prodeo (etc) My Amazon.co.uk wishlist Peter's recently played tracks (via last.fm)
Reading:Note, my earlier book reviews, and this applies somewhat to the music reviews too, were formatted as a long stream of commentary, and thus need a lot of rewriting to fit into separate entries. So there are very few previous book review entries as yet. For now check the static Reviews Archive for a bunch of earlier reviews. Stross, Charles – Singularity Sky (Wednesday, 19th of November, 2003, 4:21 pm) So Charlie Stross’s first published novel is out! I’ve been lucky enough to read another two of his novels (well, one novella) in draft form already, and read the sequel to this one directly afterwards, thanks to the generosity of the man himself. I was half-expecting this to be, well, just ok but disappointing – after all, it’s pretty much impossible to beat the gonzo radical hard speculative pre-and-post-Singularity science fiction of his Accelerando series of short stories published in Asimovs, which cram trilogies’-worth of mind-expanding speculation into each paragraph. *
And entertain us Stross does, for 313 pages. All in all, lots of fun and strongly recommended for all interested in cutting-edge political science fiction, the New Space Opera those Brits are pumping out, spy fiction, futurism, or, frankly, anything else. Well, maybe. It might be a bit way if you’re not used to this sort of thing. *Exciting news is that Accelerando will be published in novel form by Ace in 2005. Still quite a wait though! But if you’re new to Stross, there’s lots to keep you busy in the meantime…
Comments Off
Roberts, Adam – Polystom
(, 12:45 am) Nearly a year ago I wrote a rave review of Adam Roberts‘ previous novel, Stone. The lovely Mr Thomas Marchbank Allen & Unwin (Australia’s largest independent publisher – true! They bought themselves out when Penguin bought the rest of the world’s A&U, which became Allen Lane), who distribute Gollancz, asked me what I thought of Polystom in a recent email, so I told him… Seeing how stressful it was writing the previous Justina review months after reading the book, I thought it’d be easier here just to edit my musings to Thom into something workable as a review. Here goes! I did enjoy Polystom. I thought Stone was absolutely remarkable (see review link above). Fascinating concept with the narrator, and the sfnal aspects weren’t too far gone for my hard sf temperament. Polystom has a similarly unsympathetic set of characters, and a similarly arch tone to Stone. Some of the literary conceits (in both books) are amusing but slightly annoying; in Polystom, bits of the “leaves” of manuscript are missing from the story, to no apparent narrative purpose. Mind you at the end there’s a quite cute fake lit crit bit, with exerpts from scholarly articles speculating on which world is real… Which world is real? What am I talking about here? Well this is the interesting conceit of Polystom: in the world of the eponymous protagonist (and a rather mollycoddled and stuck-up aristocrat he is) the physical laws are such that a breathable atmosphere stretches between the planets and moons of the system that humanity inhabits. A stratified class system exists, and we gradually become aware of a war being fought on one planet (the “Mudworld”) that has its roots in a servants’ rebellion. The book is therefore, at least initially, an alternate history, albeit on quite a scale. The society is in most respects no further advanced than, say, Edwardian England. There are petrol-powered aeroplanes – and at the beginning of the book Polystom takes a trip in his plane from the planet of which he is Lord to the moon on which his uncle Cleonicles resides, during which trip we learn not only about Polystom’s character (he’s plagued by boredom and self-doubt, and not least by the deep and poetic self-obsession of his class) but also about the strange fauna that inhabit interplanetary space. The book has three sections, dubbed “A Love Story” (primarily about Polystom’s bizarre and doomed courting of and marriage to the caged-free-spirit Beeswing), “A Murder Story” (about the events of Cleonicles’ death) and “A Ghost Story” (in which Polystom decides he has to participate more directly in the war effort, and finds some really weird stuff going on when he gets to the Mudworld). Still, having read on Roberts’ website about his plan to write stories based around every one of science fiction’s tropes, I like the way he mixes and matches them here. Some “para-material” can be found here, and it’s as archly postmodernist as Roberts gets – I don’t think you need worry too much about spoilers, but at the same time you shouldn’t expect to get any kind of feel for the book itself from this material.
Comments Off
Robson, Justina – Natural History
(Tuesday, 18th of November, 2003, 2:51 pm) Here’s one I should’ve reviewed months ago. UK author Justina Robson came to prominence rather suddenly with her first novel, Silver Screen. She’s still pretty much unknown in the US, but has been nominated for the Arthur C Clarke award in Britain. Silver Screen managed to cover in one novel just about every variant of AI (artificial intelligence) imagined and unimagined, and dramatised many of the philosophical debates on the subject. The protagonist, a depressive self-doubting girl who possesses an eidetic memory (that is, her memory records everything in complete detail), questions whether she herself is really intelligent, or whether she’s just some sort of total recall machine… She has a delightfully close relationship with a military AI, her boyfriend is becoming a cyborg, and by the end we’ve met distributed intelligences and nanotech constructs as well. Her second novel, Mappa Mundi, took the nanotech elements further. Philosophy of mind was the focus again, with ideas of perception, self-awareness and nanotech mind-mapping bumping up against X-Files-like FBi agencies, personal politics, and world politics (from post-communist Eastern Europe to American Indians…) – and indeed weird physics. Again the protagonist was a brilliant but emotionally troubled young woman. The protagonist of Natural History is superficially similar, although from the first novel each has been less fatally plagued by self-doubt. Natural History is a far-future space opera, and not surprisingly the obsessions of the previous novels have been transferred, fascinatingly, into this setting. Humanity has split into two. The Forged, designed by humans, are genetically engineered for particular purposes – they are spaceships (of all sorts – some with space for humans inside them), winged mail couriers, huge terraforming beings, and even a hive mind… The Forged, purpose-built as they are, have a slogan that “Form Follows Function”, a principle which they simultaneously uphold and fight against. Their internal politics, mostly centred around the desire for freedom and a world of their own, is an important undercurrent in the novel. The book starts with flashes from the POV of Isol, a Voyager class Forged who’s designed to explore distant space (thus she is antisocial to the point of pathology). She has an interstellar collision with what turns out to be the remains of an alien, and in her state of near-destruction disovers an artefact with remarkable properties. Thus immediately the alien-seeming Forged, “descended” from Humanity, are contrasted with something truly alien. This alien artefact is a substance that seems to grant wishes in concrete embodiment of Clarke’s dictum that any sufficiently advanced technolgy is indistinguishable from magic. It leads to some erudite speculative phyics, and the various characters’ interaction with it gradually piece together one of the most compelling and nuanced pictures of transcendence I’ve read. Robson is clearly at the vanguard of the British reinvention of space opera (and indeed science fiction per se). There’s so much to say about this book, but it’s hard to do so without giving much away, so go read the excellent M John Harrison’s review in the Guardian. I’ll be reviewing MJH’s Light shortly…
Comments Off
Pratchett, Terry – Monstrous Regiment
(Saturday, 8th of November, 2003, 12:01 am) I’ve just finished Monstrous Regiment, and I know I say it after most of his books (although I’ve discovered upon use of the search function that lamentably I seem to not to have said so here) but I’m once again forced to declare that Terry Pratchett is the greatest living author in the world. Big words, eh? And I admit there’s an element of hyperbolae there, but not much. Pratchett is, as the blurb on the back helpfully points out, the Jonathan Swift of our times, but he’s much more. He does indeed use the Discworld to hold up a distorted (but not that distorted!) mirror to the real world, whereby he can tell us a lot of Truths while telling a rollicking good story with plenty of laugh-aloud jokes. But, as evidenced by the two Science of the Discworld books (co-written with Ian Stewart and Jack Cohen, both very fine writers in their own right), he knows his science too. Small Gods was a great critique of organised religion, and Jingo was an entertaining and pointed anti-war novel. Indeed, way way back (and I’ve been reading Pratchett since The Colour of Magic was the only Discworld novel), Equal Rites was a cute and fun feminist fantasy. But somehow in the intervening time, Pratchett’s intelligence, his love of his characters and his erudition have evolved (and been honed) into true Wisdom (with a capital “W”). And whether or not it’s due to a growing dismay at a world run by (and accepting of) George W (not for “Wisdom”) Bushes, he seems to have grown more passionate too. The feminism in Monstrous Regiment, and the anti-war/anti-religion sentiments, are angrier than I’ve seen them before… And there is certainly a political subtext, although not as explicit as that of Night Watch [note to self: what am I talking about, "explicit subtexts"? Bah!] So while I blather on, I’ve managed as yet to say practically nothing of substance about the new novel. But do I need to? I’ll say this: Anyone not as yet acquainted with Pterry’s charms won’t find much to disorient them in this book. There are some familiar faces (Sam Vimes in particular, probably one of Pratchett’s most popular characters) and locales, but they don’t matter that much. Pratchett’s style is in full force, and there are any number of laugh-aloud funny moments. But there are also some moments of true pathos, put there pointedly by Pratchett to make us angry at the misogynist, fundamentalist society under scrutiny here. And I don’t think I’ll say much about the plot or characters… Perhaps the women-disguising-themselves-as-men thing is taken a little too far, but then that’s kind of the point of Pratchett. And of course everything is “all right” in the end, but then we wouldn’t expect tragedy of Pratchett. There are some lovable characters here, and it’s worth remembering that it’s all set on the Discworld, which (as The Science of the Discworld II has brilliantly pointed out) differs from this world in that our world is bereft of narrativium. Things in the Discworld happen explicitly because of Story, and it’s astounding how much Pratchett can say about our own narrative-free world through that particular filter. Highly, highly recommended. [Narrativium is such a wonderful concept... In it is wrapped up, clearly and concisely, everything that the scientific materialist position (which I subscribe to) doesn't believe in. There is no fate, no higher-level meaning or guiding hand. Everything happens because of the sum of what happens before (and perhaps some miniscule randomising element). Higher level organisation comes out of the pandemonium of disorganised stuff, but is not the root of it all, as Dan Dennett so brilliantly pointed out in Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life.]
Comments Off
Apologies
(Friday, 7th of November, 2003, 10:19 pm) To all my faithful readers, and I know there are, well dozens of you out there in the woodworks somewhere, I hereby apologise profusely for my lack of reading updation lately. This will be resolved at the earliest opportunity. Postscript: Pratchett review up now! See sidebar.
Comments Off
Listening:Monthly archives:
Other: Login if you're, like, the author or something Meta: RSS 2.0 Comments RSS 2.0 WordPress |
19 queries. 0.676 seconds. Powered by WordPress |
Bad Behavior has blocked 201 access attempts in the last 7 days.